Faculty

Birds on the Brain

Five questions with Peter Hodum, professor of biology and environmental policy and decision making

A self-professed “outdoor bum,” Peter Hodum, professor of biology and environmental policy and decision making, spends his nonteaching days by the sea studying birds. Seabirds were a passion he discovered as a first-year student doing summer research at Bowdoin College. That opportunity was “revelatory and transformative,” he says. Now, his research centers on seabird conservation, specifically community-based conservation—an approach that centers local communities in the work. We recently talked with him about his love for birds and conservation, and how he brings this enthusiasm into the classroom.

Professor of Biology and Environmental Policy and Decision Making Peter Hodum takes a community-based approached to conservation, actively engaging locals and organizations where he works to research and preserve seabirds and their habitats.

Q: Avian ecology and conservation are your specialties. Why birds?
A: They kind of found me. When I went to college, I was interested in marine ecology and conservation, specifically marine mammals. I had an opportunity as a freshman to do research on storm-petrels, these tiny seabirds that weigh around an ounce and spend most of their lives on the open ocean. Prior to that experience, I had never thought intentionally about seabirds as marine organisms and hadn’t appreciated much about their unique natural history. My immersion into the realm of birds generally, and seabirds specifically, that summer opened up a whole world for me. I became enamored with seabirds.

Q: Your ecology projects focus not only on seabirds but on the idea of community-based conservation. What, exactly, does that mean?
A: It begins with the recognition that conservation is fundamentally a human issue. As a trained ecologist, I talk a lot about the biology of conservation, but the science is only there to help inform our thinking about what needs to be done. Beyond that, it’s all about human values, behavior, and attitudes. Traditionally, conservation biology has taken the approach that the scientific findings dictate conservation outcomes, typically without considering input from and impacts on local communities. It has been characterized by the view that humans are impediments to conservation, so you see these top-down management models that exclude voices of local communities. I don’t see that as a recipe for success in most situations. In the field of conservation, there’s been this evolution from fortress-based conservation—setting up barriers, literal and/metaphorical, and excluding people or activities—to bringing communities into the process and inviting them to participate from the outset. That is a community-based conservation approach.

Biology and Environmental Policy and Decision Making

Peter Hodum, professor

"I want to foster intellectual openness and curiosity. I don’t try to be the expert, but instead try to explore ideas alongside my students in a jointly created learning community."

Q: Any examples of successful projects that used this community-based approach?
A: I have a number from our long-term community-based conservation work in Chile, but one recent project focused on conservation fencing comes to mind. The underground breeding burrows of an endangered seabird in a national park were being damaged and collapsed by cattle, so we proposed a project to build fences to exclude cattle from this critical habitat. My team and I had already been working with this community for more than a decade on conservation actions for this species, which is important to note because this kind of conservation takes time. Without time and a genuine commitment to the community, you can’t have the trust and meaningful relationships that are key to this type of project working. Since we were already embedded in the community, we could go to stakeholders and talk about how to make the project a reality. The biggest hurdle was the cattlemen’s association. It took us a few years of meetings, site visits, proposals, and counter proposals, but we eventually got complete buy-in and strong support for the fence. Within a couple of years, the cattlemen saw this degraded landscape come back. Seeing that restored habitat in real life for them was one of those revelatory moments.

Q: How do you approach teaching?
A: I really want to foster intellectual openness and curiosity. I don’t try to be the expert, but instead try to explore ideas alongside my students in a jointly created learning community. This also requires of me that I admit when I do not know things, which is refreshingly frequent. It takes the pressure off the idea that I need to be the arbiter of information and instead creates a learning space where I am an active participant. I find that approach both liberating and intellectually honest, and I think students really appreciate that, too.

Q: What do you do when you’re not working? Any hobbies?
A: I love being out exploring the natural world. At heart, I am a naturalist and outdoorsy person. I love being in my sea kayak, hiking, backpacking, and climbing with my family. They bring me the most joy and are the most grounding, as well.

Explore More Stories